Perspectives On The Use Of Qiyas Between Imam Bukhari And Imam Syafie

M. Qamarulzaman M. Zani; Amran  Abdul Halim; Azman  Ab Rahman

doi:10.33102/jfatwa.vol29no3.612

Authors

M. Qamarulzaman M. Zani Faculty Of Quranic Sunnah Studies, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Bandar Baru Nilai, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, MALAYSIA
Amran Abdul Halim Faculty Of Quranic Sunnah Studies, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Bandar Baru Nilai, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, MALAYSIA
Azman Ab Rahman Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-Undang, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800 Nilai Negeri Sembilan, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol29no3.612

Keywords:

Qiyas, Imam Bukhari, Imam Syafie, Usul Fiqh

Abstract

The issue of applying fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) in today's society highlights the need for a method that can harmonize the adaptation of Quranic and Hadith texts with changing times. Qiyas (analogical reasoning) is considered effective, especially in addressing new and complex issues where clear guidance from the Quran and Sunnah is lacking. Without Qiyas, Islamic law would struggle to keep up with evolving customs and modern dynamics. Since Qiyas is one of the key method today, alternative approaches are needed to assist in forming ijtihad (independent reasoning) to resolve new legal issues. This study aims to explain the differences and similarities in the use of Qiyas in ijtihad by Imam Bukhari and Imam Syafi'e through a qualitative analysis of relevant books and articles. The findings reveal that Imam Bukhari's use of Qiyas was limited to Qiyas Jali (clear analogy), while Imam Syafi'e also favored Qiyas Jali and rejected Qiyas Khafiy (hidden analogy), aligning with Imam Bukhari's approach despite differences in their Usul Fiqh methods. This study provides a new perspective differences opinion on Qiyas, offering insights into its use in ijtihad and opening alternative opportunities from Imam Bukhari's perspective, which can be considered alongside Imam Syafi'e's approach in modern discussions of Islamic law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd al-Karim Zaydan (1994), al-Wajiz fi usul al-fiqh, Mua'assasat al-Risalah

Nashirun: Beirut.

Amiruddin M. Jamil (2015), Kaedah penggunaan Sumber Hukum Dalam Berfatwa oleh Majlis Permusyarawatan Ulama’ (MPU), Sarjana Sastera Pengajian Islam, Universiti Utara Malayisa.

Abu Faris, Muhammad Abdul al-Qadir (1989), Fiqh al-Imam al-Bukhari, Al-Urdun : Dar al-Furqan, Jilid 2.

Al-Baghdadi, Abi Bakar Ahmad B. Ali Al-Baghdadi, Syarah Ashab al-Hadis,Dar Al-Ihya’: Misr, Vol. 1.

Abdus Salam Al-Mubarakfuri (2002), Sirah al-Imam al-Bukhari (Sayyidul Fuqaha Wa Imamul Muhaddisin), Dar Ilm Fawaid : Makkah, Vol. 1.

As-Syafie, Muhammad Bin Idris As-Syafie (1940), al-Risalah, Tahqiq : Ahmad Muhammad Syakir, Dar Al-Kitabul Ilmiyah : Beirut Lubnan.

Al-Jai’ed, Satar Bin Thawab (1993), Fiqh al-Imam al-Bukhari fi al-Buyu’ wa al-Salam min Jami’ihi al-Sahih. Jami’ah Umm al-Qurra, Vol. 2.

Abdul Qahir Muhammad Ahmad Mukhtar Qamar (1995), Fiqh Imam al Bukhari fi al-Imarah wa al-Qada’ min Jami’ihi al-Sahih, Thesis, Jami’ah Umm al-Qura’, Mecca.

David. M. Lang (1971), A Guide To Eastern Literatures, Praeger Publisher, First

Edition (January).

Faisal Ahmadi, M. Randy Martadinata, A. Apriani, N. Razinah (2020), The Values Of Qiyas In Islamic Jurispundence, Jurnal Wasatiyyah : Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2, Disember.

H. Amir Syarifuddin (1999), Ushul Fiqh, PT Logos Wacana Ilmu: Jakarta.

H. Kadenun (2018), Istihsan Sebagai Sumber dan Metode Hukum Islam,Qalamuna, Vol. 10, No. 2, July – December.

Hussain Hamid Hassan (1971), Nazariyyah al-Maslahah fi al-Fiqh al-Islamiy, Islamiy, Universiti Al-Azhar : Kaherah.

Huzemah Tahido Yanggo (2011), Pengantar Perbandingan Mazhab, Gaung Persada : Jakarta.

Ibnu Hajar, Ahmad Bin Ali Bin Hajar (1963), Hady Al-Sariy, tahqiq : Ibrahim Iwad Misr, Mustafa al-Babi Al-Halabi, Vol. 1.

Ishak Suliaman M. Murshidi M. N. (2015), Fiqh dan Ijtihad Imam Al-Bukhari, Dewan Bahasa Pustaka (DBP) : Kuala Lumpur.

Imam Haramayn Al-Juwayni, Imam Jalaluddin Al-Mahalli (2001), Syarah Waraqat Fi Usul Fiqh, Dar Al-Fadhilah: Cairo.

M. Noor Deris (1994), Pemakaian Teori Al-Masalih Al-Mursalah dari Perspektif Mazhab Syafie, Jurnal Islam 2.

M. B. Abd Al-Karim Al-Syahrastani (2007), al-Milal wa al-Nihal, Dar al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah : Beirut, Vol. 3.

M. Tahir Jalaluddin (1953), Ta’yid Tadhkirah Muttabi’ al-Sunnah fi al-Rad ‘Ala al-Qa’il bi Sunniyah, Zi United Press, Pulau Pinang.

Munadi Usman (2017), Pengantar Ilmu Usul Fiqh, Unimal Press,.

M. B. Ahmad B. Utsman Al-Zahabi (1992), Syi’ir Alam an-Nubala’, Muassasah Ar-Risalah : Beirut, Vol. 12.

M. Fathoni Hasyim, Liliek Channa A. W., I. Amrusi J., Basuki, A. Wijaya, Nur Ahid (2020), The Process of Al-Bukhari Fiqh Methodology Development in Islamic Law, International Journal Of Innovation, Creativity and Change Vol. 14, Issues 1.

Nasrun Haroen (1997), Ushul Fiqh, Logos Wacana Ilmu : Jakarta, Cet. 2.

Nasrullah (2017), Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI), Studi Atas Penggunaan Metodologi Qiyas Sebagai Upaya Penetapan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia Al-Fikra : Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, Vol. 6, No. 2 July – December.

Remiswal, A. Anggraini, Asma B., Z. Nazar (2021), Introduction To Qiyas and Maslahah and Its Application In the Future, Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, Vol. 12, No. 2, December.

R. Marston Speight (1993), The Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. Micea Eliade, Collier Macmillan Publisher : London, Vol. 2.

Soerjono Soekanto, Mustafa A. (1982), Sosiologi Hukum Dalam Masyarakat Rajawali : Jakarta, Edition.

Scott D. Lucas (2006),'The Legal Principles Of Muhammad B. Ismail Al-Bukhari

and Their Relationship To Classical Salafi Islam', Islamic Law & Society,

Tajudeen Muhameed B. A. (2004), Relevance Of Qiyas (Analogical Deduction) As A Source Of Islamic Law In Contemporary Times, M.A Thesis, Open Repository Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

Zakky al-Din Sya'ban (1964), Ushul al- Fiqh al-Islami, Dar al-Ta'lif: Egypt.