Kerangka Fiqh Bagi Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Islam: Analisis Naratif Terhadap Persidangan Ke-26 Majmaʿ Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Al-Duwalī

A Jurisprudential Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Islam: Narrative Analysis of the 26th Session of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy

Authors

  • Muhamad Faisal Ashaari MY Pusat Kajian Dakwah dan Kepimpinan, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43000, Bangi, MALAYSIA
  • Irwan Mohd Subri MY Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-Undang, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Bandar Baru Nilai 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, MALAYSIA
  • Hasanah Abd Khafidz MY Pusat Kajian Dakwah dan Kepimpinan, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43000, Bangi, MALAYSIA
  • Jawaher Hamad Muhammad Al-Marri QA Bahagian Latihan dan Pembangunan Profesional, Kementerian Wakaf dan Hal Ehwal Islam, Dafna St., Doha, QATAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no2.805

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence Jurisprudence, Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence, Sharīʿah Legal Responsibility and Liability, Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah

Abstract

The capability of artificial intelligence (AI) to emulate cognitive functions and make autonomous decisions challenges the foundations of Islamic jurisprudence, which are grounded in reason, intention, and free will as conditions of legal accountability (taklīf), while also raising issues concerning the imitation and alteration of divine creation. Existing scholarship has predominantly adopted conceptual approaches grounded in individual scholarly perspectives, with limited attention given to the collective deliberations of authoritative international fiqh institutions. The lack of systematic analysis of institutional fiqh discourse has consequently created a significant gap in understanding the trajectory of contemporary Islamic legal thought on AI. In response to this gap, the present study evaluates Islamic legal and ethical responses to AI through a narrative review of 33 papers presented at the 26th session of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy. The analysis is structured around five principal juristic criteria: al-ahliyyah (legal capacity), al-mas’ūliyyah (legal responsibility), al-amān (liability and compensation), al-tashabbuh (imitation of divine creation), and taghyīr khalqillāh (alteration of divine creation). These criteria serve as the analytical framework for assessing prevailing legal positions and delineating ethical boundaries concerning AI. The findings indicate that the majority of scholars reject recognizing AI as a legal subject due to the absence of al-ahliyyah, thereby maintaining human beings as the central locus of Sharīʿah and moral responsibility. The discussion is predominantly framed within legal analysis, while ethical considerations appear implicitly through the framework of maqāid al-sharīʿah as a value-governance mechanism. The study affirms that contemporary Islamic jurisprudence on AI is developing through the application of established fiqh instruments and highlights the need for a more systematic framework to guide fatwa institutions and policymakers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Muhamad Faisal Ashaari, Pusat Kajian Dakwah dan Kepimpinan, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43000, Bangi, MALAYSIA

    Senior Lecturer,
    Pusat Kajian Dakwah dan Kepimpinan, Fakulti Pengajian Islam,
    Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
    43000 Bangi,
    Selangor MALAYSIA

  • Irwan Mohd Subri, Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-Undang, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Bandar Baru Nilai 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, MALAYSIA

    Profesor,
    Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-Undang,
    Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)

  • Hasanah Abd Khafidz, Pusat Kajian Dakwah dan Kepimpinan, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43000, Bangi, MALAYSIA

    Senior Lecturer,
    Pusat Kajian Dakwah dan Kepimpinan, Fakulti Pengajian Islam,
    Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
    43000 Bangi,
    MALAYSIA

References

Abdulrahman, M. M., & Walusimbi, A. H. M. (2024). Examining the role of artificial intelligence (GPT-3.5) in issuing fatwas for Islamic family cases: A comparative analysis. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law, 9(2), 30–38.

Abdelnour, M. G. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the Islamic theology of technology: From “means” to “meanings” and from “minds” to “hearts”. Religions 16(6): 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16060796

Abd al-Raḥīm, M. ʿA. (2022). Al-dhakāʾ al-iṣṭināʿī wa-atharuhu fī al-ḍamān fī al-fiqh al-islāmī: Dirāsah fiqhiyyah muqāranah. Majallat al-Dirāsāt al-Qānūniyyah, 55(1), 1-99.

Barkani, O. N., & Boukhalfi, A. (2024). Al-qawāʿid al-sharʿiyyah al-ḍābiṭah li al-dhakāʾ al-ṣināʿī [The rules of Sharia regulating artificial intelligence]. Majallat al-Rāyah, 14(3), 52–72.

Al-Burnū, M. Ṣ. A. M. (2003). Mawsūʿat al-qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah (Jil. 1–12). Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah.

Chin, A. H. B., Roslan, R., Alsomali, N., Al-Balas, Q., Salhab, B. B. S., & Muhsin, S. M. M. (2025). Islamic bioethics viewpoint on elective brain chip implants and brain–computer interfaces for enhancing academic performance in competitive examinations. Asian Bioethics Review, 18, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-024-00333-1

Elmahjub, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in Islamic ethics: Towards pluralist ethical benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology, 36: 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x

Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329

Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931

Guo, J. & Wang, D. (2025). Deepfake: Understanding the Technology Background, Content Differences from Traditional Forgery, and Impact on Public Trust. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 213(1), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.26901

Al-Hajery, F. M. (2024). The Sharia responsibility of artificial intelligence users: A jurisprudential study. Journal of Sharia and Islamic Studies, 39: 9–82.

Hakim, L., & Azizi, M. R. (2023). Otoritas fatwa keagamaan dalam konteks era kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI). Jurnal Ilmiah Ar-Risalah: Media Ke-Islaman, Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam, 21(2), 164–174.

Hamsin, M. K., Anggriawan, R. & Jiatrahman, F. (2023). Unveiling ethical implications: AI robot accountability in Islamic context. Jurnal Media Hukum, 30(2): 117–135. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v30i2.18524

Joseph, J. (2025). The algorithmic self: how AI is reshaping human identity, introspection, and agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 16:1645795. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645795

Kosasih, E., Islamy, M. R. F. & Wiwaha, R. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the era of Society 5.0: Compromising technological innovation through the Wasathiyyah approach within the framework of Islamic law. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2): 551–572. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.9596

Al-Kubaisi, A. A. S. H. (2024). Ethics of artificial intelligence: A purposeful and foundational study in light of the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad. Religions 15(11): 1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111300

Mahamood, S. F., Fikry, A., Hamzah, M. I., Khalid, M. M., Rosyad, A. M. & Bhari, A. 2023. Fiqh robotic for artificial intelligent in humanoids used for therapy, services and other social activities: An integration of AI and Maqasid Shariah. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 28(2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol28no2.527

Al-Hamyani, M. b. M. b. B. (2019). Taʿrīf al-masʾūliyyah fī al-fiqh al-islāmī wa al-niẓām al-suʿūdī. Majallat al-Dirāsāt al-ʿArabiyyah, 39(3): 1563-1590. https://doi.org/10.21608/dram.2019.183034

Munshi, A. A., Al-Sabban, W. H., Farag, A. T., Rakha, O. E., Al Sallab, A., & Alotaibi, M. (2022). Automated Islamic jurisprudential legal opinions generation using artificial intelligence. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 30(2), 1135–1156. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.2.16

Al-Momani, I. (2025). Ethical challenges for using artificial intelligence in understanding Islamic jurisprudence. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 4, 1519. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251519

Najib, N. M., Basarud-din, S. K., & Fazial, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Islamic Finance: A Maqasid Al-Shariah Perspective. Int. J. Law, Gov. Commun, 10(40), 41-50.

Nawi, A., Khamis, N. Y., Yaakob, M. F. M., Samuri, M. A. A. & Zakaria, G. A. N. (2023). Exploring opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence research for Islamic ethical guidelines. Afkar, 25(2): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol25no2.1

Salqīnī, Ibrahim Muhammad. (1996). al-Muyassar Fi Usul al-Fiqh al-Islamiyy. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr al-Mu‘asir.

Sitiris, M. & Busari, S. A. (2024). The legal capacity (al-ahliyyah) of artificial intelligence from an Islamic jurisprudential perspective. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(1): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.453

Sūriyyah Sharfāwī. (2018). Al-Mas’ūliyyah Wa Aḥkāmuhā Min Khilāl al-Kitāb Wa al-Sunnah. Atruhah Muqaddamah Li Nayl al-Dukturah Fī al-‘Ulum al-Islāmiyyah. Jāmi‘ah al-Hajj Likhidir Batinah, al-Jaza’ir.

al-Tayyār, ‘Abdullah bin Muhammad, al-Mutlaq, ‘Abdullah bin Muhammad & al-Mūsā, Muhammad bin Ibrahīm. (2012). Al-Fiqh al-Muyassar. Al-Riyad: Madār al-Watan Li al-Nashr.

Uthman, Ahmad Khairi Mahmud. (2025). Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Islamic Jurisprudence. Journal of the Faculty of Sharia and Law, Tefhana Al-Ashraf, Al-Azhar University, 30: 473–518.

Yunos, A. S., Wan Saifuddin, W. M. S., & Hamdan, M. N. (2024). The concept of al-ʾahliyyah and takyīf fiqhiyy for autonomous mobile robots according to Shariah. al-Qanatir, 33(7), 14–32. https://www.al-qanatir.com/aq/article/view/1035

Yunos, A. S., Wan Saifuddin, W. M. S., Hamdan, M. N. ., & Baharudin, M. H. . (2025). Tanggungjawab Perubatan dalam Pembedahan yang dibantu Robot Menurut Perspektif Etika Islam dan Fiqh: (Medical Responsibility in Robot-Assisted Surgery from Islamic Ethical and Fiqh Perspectives). Jurnal Fiqh, 22(1), 73–107. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol22no1.3

Al-Zuḥaylī, M. M. (2006). Al-Wajīz fī uṣūl al-fiqh al-islāmī (2nd ed., 2 vols.). Damascus, Syria: Dār al-Khayr li al-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzī‘.

Published

26-05-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kerangka Fiqh Bagi Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Islam: Analisis Naratif Terhadap Persidangan Ke-26 Majmaʿ Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Al-Duwalī: A Jurisprudential Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Islam: Narrative Analysis of the 26th Session of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy. (2026). Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 31(2), 391-419. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no2.805

Similar Articles

1-10 of 448

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>