Tort Litigation Versus Mediation in Medico-Legal Disputes: Evaluating The Limits Of Mediation and Proposals for Reform

Siti Farahiyah Ab Rahim; Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum

doi:10.33102/jfatwa.vol30no2.710

Authors

Siti Farahiyah Ab Rahim Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, MALAYSIA
Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum Fakultas Hukum, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, INDONESIA

https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol30no2.710

Keywords:

Medico-Legal, Mediation, Malaysia, Indonesia, Sulh

Abstract

Mediation has increasingly been promoted as an alternative to litigation in resolving medico-legal disputes. A substantial body of literature critiques the adversarial nature of tort litigation, particularly the evidentiary burdens imposed on patients, the emotional toll of courtroom proceedings, and systemic delays that undermine access to justice. In contrast, mediation is praised for its efficiency, confidentiality, and potential to facilitate amicable settlements in a less confrontational setting. However, despite growing advocacy for mediation, there remains a notable gap in academic discourse concerning its structural limitations especially in the context of medical negligence. This paper addresses that gap by critically examining the current use of mediation in Malaysia and Indonesia, two jurisdictions with distinct legal traditions but similar institutional challenges. Using a doctrinal legal research methodology combined with comparative analysis, this study systematically reviews statutory frameworks, case law, and institutional practices to evaluate the practical effectiveness of mediation in resolving medical negligence disputes. Scholarly literatures are also analysed to uncover recurring procedural and structural shortcomings. The paper argues that while mediation holds considerable promise, it often provides only the illusion of resolution due to the non-binding and unenforceable nature of its outcomes. In cases where patient harm is severe and power imbalances are pronounced, such weaknesses may leave injured parties without meaningful remedy. As a key contribution, the paper proposes several targeted reforms: (1) the introduction of mandatory mediation for appropriate medical cases; (2) the establishment of specialised medico-legal mediation panels; and (3) the granting of legal enforceability to mediated settlements through court registration. These reforms are essential to strengthen public trust in mediation and to ensure it delivers real, enforceable justice in the sensitive context of medical harm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, M., & Rohana, A. R. (2016). The Role of Expert Evidence in Medical Negligence Litigation in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(3), 1057 -1068.

Amirthalingam, K. (2017). Medical dispute resolution, patient safety and the doctor-patient relationship. Singapore medical journal, 58(12), 681.

Azmi, I. I., Daud, N. M., Atkin, B., & Khan, F. M. R. (2021). Medical negligence dispute resolution in Malaysia: time for legal reform. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 6(16), 191-196.

Barbour, R.S., Kingdom, U., Buscatto, M., Chamberlain, K., Zealand, N., Coetzee, J.K. &Sun, J. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. SAGE Publications Inc, Los Angeles.

Bolam vs Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 2 All ER 118)

Donogue v. Stevenson, 1932, A.C. 562.

Hatta, M. (2018). The position of expert witnesses in medical malpractice cases in Indonesia. Al-Ahkam, 28(1), 47-72.

Hatta, M., Sumiadi, S., & Zulfan, Z. (2024). Settlement of Medical Negligence Cases in Malaysia. In Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS) (Vol. 4, pp. 00059-00059).

Hidayani, P. P., & Hatta, M. (2023). Medical Negligence Concept in Malaysia: A Legal Study. Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(4), 298-314.

Ichsan, M., Susila, M. E., & Gunawan, Y. (2022). Medical malpractice in the perspective of Islamic law. In 23rd Annual WAML Congress (p. 185).

Kassim, P. N. J., & Najid, K. M. (2013). Medical negligence disputes in Malaysia: resolving through hazards of litigation or through community responsibilities?. In Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (No. 78, p. 1607). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET).

Kaur, S., Chin, C. A., & Aziz, M. F. B. A. (2022). ‘Medical Negligence in Malaysia: Selected Issues of Liabilities and Damages’?. Medical Liability in Asia and Australasia, 163-175.

Khan, H. A., Bastiampillai, A., & Mon, S. W. (2020). Mediation as a suitable dispute resolution method in medical negligence cases: Special reference to the Malaysian position. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(3), 2309-2323.

Medical Practice Division, Ministry of Health. e-Bulletin Medico Legal Section Volume 3. <https://hq.moh.gov.my/medicalprac/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CML-e-BULETIN-2022-final.pdf#page=24.12>

Menon S. Shaping the future of dispute resolution and improving access to justice. Global Pound Conference Series 2016 Singapore.<https://sidra.smu.edu.sg/sites/sidra.smu.edu.sg/files/documents/Global%20Pound%20Conference%20Series%202016%2C%20Shaping%20the%20Future%20of%20Dispute%20Resolution%20%20Improving%20Access%20to%20Justice.pdf> Accessed 30 May 2025.

Mokhtar, M. F. M. (2024). Medical Negligence Dispute in Malaysia: Choosing Mediation as the Best Constructive Approach to Address the Paradoxes in Medical Negligence Claims. European Journal of Medicine and Natural Sciences, 7 (1), 147-159.

Mulyadi, D., Danil, E., Chandrawila, W., & Warman, K. (2020). Medical Negligence Dispute Settlement in Indonesia. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(4). 4229-4233.

Nasrul, M. A. D., Shah, N. A. M. A., Salim, W. N. M., & Seviyana, D. (2024). A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Mediation Practices in Indonesia and Malaysia. Khazanah Hukum, 6(1), 63-80.

Neely, A.H. & Ponshunmugam, A. (2019). A qualitative approach to examining health care access in rural South Africa. Social Science and Medicine, 230, 214-221.

Order 34 Rules of Court 2012 Malaysia < https://kl.kehakiman.gov.my/en/rules-court-2012 >. Retrieved on 31 May 2025

Practice Direction Regarding Mediation No. 2 Year 2022 Malaysia < https://kl.kehakiman.gov.my/en/practice-directions-regarding-mediation>. Retrieved on 31 May 2025.

Raveesh, B. N., Nayak, R. B., & Kumbar, S. F. (2016). Preventing medico-legal issues in clinical practice. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 19 (Suppl 1), S15-S20.

Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Qualitative Research, in Beretvas, N., (Ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.

Shipley, A. (2018). Mediation In Medical Malpractice Cases: An Opportunity for Financial Savings, Emotional Closure, And Future Medical Improvement. Dispute Resolution Journal, 73(2), 39-50.

Sinamo, N., & Sibarani, S. (2020, May). Medical malpractice in the legal view. In Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2019) (pp. 28-34). Atlantis Press.

Susila, M. E. (2021). The Use of Amicable Settlement for Resolving Medical Malparctice in Indonesia. Medicine, Law & Society, 14 (1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.18690/mls.14.1.119-134.2021

Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R. & DeVault, M.L. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Zahir, M. Z. M., Hatta, M., Khairunnisa, C., & Nurhayati, Y. (2024). Expert Witness against the Crime of Medical Malpractice in Indonesia. Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), 404-412.