Pengagihan Sumber Perubatan Terhad Dalam Menangni Pandemik Covid-19:Prinsip Keadilan dari Perspektif Bioetika dan Sharia'ah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol23no1.327Keywords:
bioetika, COVID-19, pengagihan sumber, keadilan, shariahAbstract
At the end of 2019, the world was shaken by the discovery of a new coronavirus strain (SARS-CoV-2), which was identified to be the source of the outbreak that originated in China. The outbreak, which was subsequently named COVID-19, was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organisation and has adversely affected and impacted upon many countries, not only from the aspects of medical and health care services, but also with respect to economic stability, financial management and social security. The treatment of COVID-19 patients is costly and involves limited resources, particularly in the case of critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation. Thus, medical practitioners are faced with complex issues in justifying the distribution of health care resources to deserving patients. This article seeks to discuss the concept of justice in the distribution of health care resources from the bioethical and Islamic standpoints. The research employs the qualitative method of doctrinal analysis, which comprises primary and secondary sources relating to the principle of justice in contemporary medical ethics and from the sharīcah point of view. Findings of this study illustrate that there exist similarities between the two perspectives, which among others, include the agreed nexus between the allocation of scarce resources to patients and deliberations on the futility of medical treatment.
Abstrak
Pada penghujung tahun 2019, dunia digemparkan dengan penemuan strain coronavirus baru (SARS-CoV-2) yang dikenalpasti sebagai punca wabak absah yang bermula di China, yang kemudiannya dinamakan COVID-19. Wabak yang telah diisytiharkan sebagai pandemik oleh Pertubuhan Kesihatan Sedunia ini menjejaskan dan memberi impak yang signifikan terhadap kelangsungan sesebuah negara bukan sahaja dari aspek perkhidmatan perubatan dan penjagaan kesihatan, tetapi juga dari segi kestabilan ekonomi, pengurusan kewangan dan keselamatan sosial. Rawatan pesakit COVID-19 melibatkan kos yang tinggi dan sumber yang terhad, terutamanya pesakit-pesakit kritikal yang memerlukan alat bantuan pernafasan. Oleh itu, pengamal perubatan berhadapan dengan isu-isu yang kompleks tentang kewajaran pengagihan sumber yang terhad kepada pesakit yang berhak. Makalah ini bertujuan untuk mengupas konsep keadilan dalam pengagihan sumber perubatan dari sudut pandangan bioetika dan bagaimana Islam menangani isu tersebut. Kajian ini mengaplikasi metode kualitatif iaitu analisa doktrin yang merujuk kepada sumber-sumber utama dan sekunder berkaitan prinsip keadilan di dalam etika perubatan moden dan dari sudut pandangan sharīcah. Hasil kajian mendapati bahawa terdapat persamaan di antara kedua-dua perspektif tersebut, antaranya justifikasi pengagihan sumber perubatan yang terhad berkait rapat dengan pertimbangan tentang rawatan perubatan yang tidak membawa apa-apa manfaat (futile treatment).
Downloads
References
Abdallah S. Daar & A. Binsumeit, Al Khitamy. 2001. Bioethics for Clinicians: 21. Islamic Bioethics. Journal of the Canadian Medical Association. Vol. 164 No. 1. Ottawa: CMAJ Group.
Abu-El-Noor, Nasser Ibrahim & Abu-El-Noor, Mysoon-Khalil. 2014. End of Life Decisions: an Islamic Perspective. Online Journal of Health Ethics. Vol. 10 No. 1. University of Southern Mississippi.
Abu Fadl Mohsin Ebrahim. 2006. End of Life Issues: Making Use of Extraordinary Means to Sustain Life. Dalam Federation of Islamic Medical Associations. FIMA Year Book 2005-2006: Geriatrics and End of Life Issues: Biomedical, Ethical & Islamic Horizons. Amman: Jordan Society for Islamic Medical Sciences.
Ahmad al-Raisūnīyy. 2010. Naẓariyyāt al-Maqāṣid cInda al-Imām al-Shaṭībī. Herndon: al Macahad al cĀlamīyy lil al Fikr al Islāmīyy.
Aasim I. Padela. 2007. Islamic medical ethics: A primer. Bioethics. Vol. 21. United States: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Al-Bukhārīyy, Muhammad bin Ismacīl. 1422H. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārīyy. Ed.1. Dimashq: Dār Tauq Al-Najāḥ. Jil. 1. Ms.54. No. Hadith 221.
Beauchamp, Thomas L. & Childress James F. 2001. Principles of Medical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bommel, A van. 1999. Medical Ethics from the Muslim Perspective. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement. Vol. 74. United States: Springer.
Cavalieri, Thomas A. 2001. Ethical Issues at the End of Life. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Vol. 101 No. 10. Chicago: American Osteopathic Association.
Choong, Katrina & Chandia, Mahmood. 2014. Technology at the End of Life: ‘Medical Futility’ and the Muslim PVS Patient. Int. Rev. Law. Vol. 2013. Qatar: Hamad bin Khalifa University Press.
Cummings, Christy L. & Mercurio, Mark L. 2010. Ethics for the Pediatrician: Autonomy, Beneficence and Rights. Pediatrics in Review. Vol. 31 No. 6. United States: American Academy of Pediatrics.
General Medical Council. 2010. “Treatment and Care towards the End of Life: Good Practice in Decision Making.” http//www.gmc-uk.org/guidance (diakses pada 24 Mac 2020).
Gillon, Ranaan. 1985. Beneficence: Doing Good for Others. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.). Vol. 291 No. 6487. London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Hassan, Chamsi-Pasha & Mohammed Ali, Albar. 2013. Western and Islamic Bioethics: How Close is the Gap?. Avicenna Journal of Medicine. Vol. 3 No. 1. United States: Syrian American of Medical Society.
Kiarash Aramesh. 2008. Justice as a Principle of Islamic Bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics. Vol. 8 No. 10. London: Taylor & Francis.
Kinsella, John & Booth, Malcolm G. 2007. Ethical Framework for End of Life Decisions in Intensive Care in the UK. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health. Saitama: Japan National Insttute of Public Health.
Ibn cĀshur. 2006. Ibn cĀshur: Treatise on Maqāṣid al-Sharīcah, terjemahan Muhammad el Tahir el Mesawi. Petaling Jaya: Islamic Book Trust.
Ibn Ḥajar al-cĀsqalānīyy. 2006. Fatḥul Bāri: Penjelasan Kitab Shahih al-Bukhari. Vol. 2. Jakarta: Pustaka Azaam.
Khaliq, Ahmad & Arif, Hassan. 2000. Distributive Justice: The Islamic Perspective. Intellectual Discourse. Vol. 8 No. 2. Kuala Lumpur: International Islamic University Malaysia.
Lasagna, Louis. "Hippocratic Oath: Modern Version". Tufts University, <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/hippocratic-oath-today.html> (diakses pada 24 Mac 2020).
McMurray, R. J., Clarke, O. W., & Barrasso, J. A. 1992. Decisions Near the End of Life: Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Journal of the American Medical Association. Vol. 267 No. 16. United States: American Medical Association.
Meisel Alan. 2008. End-of-Life Care. Dalam Crowley M (ed), From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center Bioethics Briefing Book. New York: The Hastings Center.
Mohammad Reza Heidari. 2007. A Comparative Analysis of Distributive Justice in Islamic and Non-Islamic Frameworks. Dalam 2nd Islamic Conference (IECONS2007) (Faculty of Economics and Muamalat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia).
Mohammad Yousuf, Rathor, Mohammad Fauzi Abdul Rani, Azarisman Shah Mohamad Shah, Wan Islah Leman, Sheikh Farid Uddin Akter & Ahmad Marzuki Omar. 2011. The Principle of Autonomy as related to Personal Decision-making concerning Health and Research from an ‘Islamic Viewpoint’. Journal of the International Medical Association. Vol. 43. Illinois: Islamic Medical Association of North America.
Omar Hasan Kasule. 2004. Medical Ethics from Maqasid Al Shari’at. Arab Journal of Psychiatry. Vol.15, No. 2. Amman: Arab Federation of Psychiatrists.
Omar Hasan Kasule. 2006. “Artificial Life Support.” Islamic Medical Education Resources. http://omarkasule-tib.blogspot.my/2011/05/060823l-artificial-life-support.html (diakses pada 24 Mac 2020).
Omar Hasan Kasule. 2006. Rulings on Euthanasia from the Perspective of Purposes (Maqasid) and Principles (Qawacid) of the Islamic Law (Al-Sharicah). Dalam Federation of Islamic Medical Associations. FIMA Year Book 2005-2006: Geriatrics and End of Life Issues: Biomedical, Ethical & Islamic Horizons. Amman: Jordan Society for Islamic Medical Sciences.
Sahin Aksoy S, & Abdurrahman Elmali. 2002. The Core Concepts of the ‘Four Principles’ of Bioethics as Found in Islamic Tradition. Medicine and Law. New York: World Association of Medical Law.
Sahin Aksoy & Ali Tenik. 2002. The ‘Four Principles of Bioethics’ as Found in 13th Century Muslim Scholar Mawlana’s Teachings. BMC Medical Ethics. Vol. 3. United States: Springer.
Saifuddeen SM, Rahman NNA, Isa NM & Baharuddin A. 2013. Maqasid Al-Shariah as a Complementary Framework to Conventional Bioethics. Sci. Eng. Ethics. United States: Springer.
Steinberg, Avraham. 2003. Medical Ethics. Dalam Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics: A Compilation of Jewish Medical Law on All Topics of Medical Interest. Vol. I. 389-404. New York: Feldheim Publishers.
Rispler-Chaim, Vardit. 1989. Islamic Medical Ethics in the 20th Century. Journal of Medical Ethics. Vol. 15. London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tallon, Carole. 2012. Ethics and End of Life Care. Journal of Observational Pain Medicine. Vol. 1 No. 1. United Kingdom: KJD Communications.
Wahbah al-Zuhailiyy. 1996. Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmīyy. Vol. 2. Damsyik: Dar al-Fikr.
Yusuf al-Qaraḍāwīy. 1993. Fatāwā Mucāsirah. Vol. 2. Egypt: Dar al-Wafa il al-Tibācah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīc.
Yusuf al-Qaraḍāwīyy. 2006. Dirāsah fi Fiqh Maqāṣid al-Sharīcah: Bayna al Maqāṣid al Kuliyyah wa al Nuṣūṣ al Juz’iyyah. Cairo: Dar Al Shuruq.
Zubair Hasan. 1988. Distributional Equity in Islam. Dalam Munawar Iqmal (ed.). Distributive Justice and Need Fulfilment in an Islamic Economy. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Fadhlina Alias, Syaryanti Hussin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.