A Preliminary Framework of Forensic Science Fundamentals Based on its Elements in Shariah Manuscripts
Forensic science has become an ‘odd’ to the shariah due to the dual educational system that segregationally treats science different from religion. As to stitch back the loophole, this study aims to identify forensic elements in classical legal scripts that can lead to the formation of integration theory. This study used Grounded Theory Method that relied upon constant comparative approach guided by literature analysis. The theoretical samples were gathered from classical legal opinions in the admissibility of circumstantial evidence in Islam. This study found that there were 117 free nodes that constantly built four key fundamentals for the framework which were forensics jurisprudence, human capital, forensic analysis, and accreditation. This study proved that there is a connection between science and religion through the application of forensics in Islamic legal scripts. This study suggests further exploratory research on each key fundamental found thus completes the theory development process of this framework.
Anthony J, Bertino. 2008. Forensic Science Fundamentals and Investigations. United States of America: South Western Cengage Learning.
Creswell, John W. 2012. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage.
Houck, Max M and Jay A Siegel. 2010. Fundamentals of Forensic Science: Academic Press.
Muslim, Ibn al-Ḥajjāj Abū al-Ḥasan al-Qashīrī al-Naysābūrī. n.d. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (al-Musnad al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-Mukhtaṣār
binaql al-'Adl 'an al-'Adl ilā Rasulillāh). Beyrūt: Dār al-Iḥyā' al-Turāth al-'Arabī.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 2010. Islamic life and thought: The Other Press.
Ahmad Syukran, Baharuddin, Ruskam Aminuddin and Yacob Abdul Rahim 2015. Prinsip Asas Sains Forensik dari
Perspektif Islam: Suatu Sorotan Literatur. Sains Humanika Vol 4(2): 1-6.
Ahmad Syukran, Baharuddin, Ruskam Aminuddin and Yacob Abdul Rahim 2015. The Role of Forensic Biology in
Realising Maqāsid al-Shariah (The Objectives of Islamic Law). Sains Humanika Vol 4(1): 9-15.
Ahmad Syukran, Baharuddin, Bidin Hasna, Wan Dagang Wan Ismail, Ruskam Aminuddin and Yacob Abdul Rahim
Fiqh Forensics: Integration between Sciences and Islamic Law for Autopsies and Identification of Deceased.
Sains Humanika Vol 4(2).
Ahmad Syukran, Baharuddin, Wan Harun Mohammad Amir, Ruskam Aminuddin and Yacob Abdul Rahim 2015.
Forensik Biologi Dalam Penjagaan Nasab (Hifz al-Nasab/ Nasl). UMRAN-International Journal of Islamic and
Civilizational Studies (EISSN: 2289-8204) Vol (2): 11-29.
Ahmad Syukran, Baharuddin, Wan Harun Mohammad Amir, Ruskam Aminuddin and Yacob Abdul Rahim 2016.
Law of Individuality and Locard’s Principle from Islamic Perspective. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol
Cassella, John and Carole McCartney 2011. Lowering the drawbridges: Legal and forensic science education for
the 21st Century. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal Vol(2): 81-93.
Draucker, Claire B, Donna S Martsolf, Ratchneewan Ross and Thomas B Rusk 2007. Theoretical sampling and
category development in grounded theory. Qualitative health research Vol(8): 1137-1148.
Glaser, Barney G 1965. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems Vol(4): 436-445.
Kirk, Paul L. 1963. The Ontogeny of Criminalistics. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science
Kolb, Sharon M 2012. Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for
educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies Vol(1): 83.
Lukman, Abdul Mutalib and Wan Ismail Wan Abdul Fattah 2012. Al-Qarīnah: antara Kekuatan dan Keperluan
dalam Mensabitkan Jenayah(Zina). International Journal of Islamic Thought Vol: 1-17.
Muhr, Thomas 1991. Atlas/ti—a prototype for the support of text interpretation. Qualitative Sociology Vol(4): 349-
Ramli Awang, Kamaruzzaman Yusoff, Badlishisham Mohd Nasir, Mohd Nasir Ripin and Hussin Solomon 2014. The
Impact of Separation Between Religion and Science. The Social Sciences Vol(1): 37-48.
Saks, Michael J and David L Faigman 2008. Failed forensics: How forensic science lost its way and how it might yet
find it. Annual Review of Law and Social Science Vol: 149-171.
Sayed Sikandar, Shah Haneef 2005. Forensic evidence: A rethinking about its use and weight in Islamic
jurisprudence. Islam in Asia Vol(1): 117-140.
Sayed Sikandar, Shah Haneef 2006. Modern Means of Proof: Legal Basis for Its Accommodation in Islamic Law.
Arab Law Quarterly Vol(4): 334-364.
Sayed Sikandar, Shah Haneef 2007. Forensic Evidence: A Comparative Analysis of the General Position in
Common Law and Sharī'ah. Islamic Studies Vol: 199-216.
Taylor, Steven J and Robert Bogdan 1998. Working with data: data analysis in qualitative research. Introduction to
qualitative research methods Vol: 134-163.
Thompson, William C and Edward L Schumann 1987. Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The
prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. Law and Human Behavior Vol(3): 167.
Ahmad Syukran, Baharuddin 2017. The Integration of Forensic Science Fundamentals and Al-Qarinah towards
Achieving Maqasid al-Shari'ah. Doctoral Degree, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Houck, Max Michael 2010. An Investigation into the Foundational Principles of Forensic Science. Doctoral Degree,
Curtin University of Technology.
Schiffer, Béatrice 2009. The relationship between forensic science and judicial error: a study covering error
sources, bias, and remedies. Doctoral Degree, University of Lausanne.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Fatwa Management and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.